(The Supreme Court didn’t end up taking the case.) And as Cruz backed a lawsuit arguing that Texas had the authority to throw out election results in several other battleground states, some of his advisers worried he was turning his back on his conservative federalist principles.īut perhaps the most shocking possibility raised by the Post’s reporting is the implication raised by Cruz and Eastman’s friendship. Among other things, Cruz agreed to represent Pennsylvania Republicans’ attempt to block certification of their state’s presidential results before the Supreme Court. Bush’s campaign during the recount of the Florida vote in 2000. Cruz spoke to Trump directly on the phone, acted as a Trump surrogate spreading 2020 disinformation on Fox News and pitched himself as a legal asset because of his experience working with George W. ![]() He is, in fact, dead wrong.According to the Post, Cruz and Trump began working on plans to undermine the election two days after Election Day, to the surprise of many of Cruz’s aides. And that may accrue to Cruz’s benefit as he positions himself to again run for president.īut just because it might work for Cruz politically doesn’t make him right. They will likely simply see Cruz as fighting against a liberal system that makes being White and male something close to a crime. And he knows that the average person his message is aimed at won’t do even the most basic math I did above. Cruz wants to cast Biden’s pledge to pick a Black woman as just another example of “woke” culture and identity politics. What he’s up to here is pure virtue-signaling for the Republican base. He’s one of the brightest legal minds in the Republican Party – and a man who knows the Supreme Court backwards and forwards. And White men have been massively – and I mean massively – over-represented on the court.Ĭruz is no dummy. ![]() Black people – and Black women in particular – have been vastly under-represented on the Supreme Court. Which, of course, turns Cruz’s argument totally on its head. (The seven non-White males who have served as justices: Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O’Connor, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett.) ![]() A Black woman has never served on the court. That means that 94% of the justices on the Supreme Court have been White men, and that just 6% have been either a person of color, a woman or both. Here’s the math: There have been 115 Supreme Court justices in history. THE POINT - NOW ON YOUTUBE! In each episode of his weekly YouTube show, Chris Cillizza will delve a little deeper into the surreal world of politics. Which means that the better metric to use for comparison is the racial and gender composition of the court.Īnd that’s where Cruz’s argument gets into a lot of trouble. Cruz is objecting to the fact that Biden is only considering Black women for the Supreme Court. So, 6% is roughly accurate for the percentage of Black women in the US.īut, we are not talking, really, about the general population here. Women represent slightly more than half the country’s population. ![]() Just over 13% of the population is Black. On the percentage of the population that Black women comprise, at least, Cruz is right. “You know, you know Black women are what, 6% of the US population? He’s saying to 94% of Americans, ‘I don’t give a damn about you, you are ineligible.’” “The fact that he’s willing to make a promise at the outset, that it must be a Black woman, I gotta say that’s offensive,” the Republican senator said. Ted Cruz offered his take on President Joe Biden’s pledge to pick a Black woman for the forthcoming opening on the Supreme Court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |